Firecrawl vs WebScrapingAPI

Firecrawl
www.firecrawl.dev
72%
Success
5.4s
Speed
$2.7
Cost
Visit site
Firecrawl
vs
WebScrapingAPI
WebScrapingAPI
www.webscrapingapi.com
68%
Success
17.7s
Speed
$2.04
Cost
Visit site

Side-by-side comparison of Firecrawl and WebScrapingAPI using the latest benchmark data for success rate, speed, cost, and features.

Pros & Cons of Firecrawl

Pros
  • Scrape websites data in LLM-ready format.
  • Ability to crawl entire websites using one API call.
  • Control the headless browser actions after a certain process.
  • Python and NodeJS SDKs.
  • Low pricing entry point at $19.
  • Integrations for no-code tools: n8n, Zapier, Make, and Dfyn.
Cons
  • Plan to credits are considered expensive compared to other services.
  • Blocked requests are charged.
  • Credits do not roll over to the next month/year.
  • No pay-per-use plan offered.
  • No support for webhook callbacks.

Pros & Cons of WebScrapingAPI

Pros
  • Good scraper blocking bypass.
  • Simple pricing structure 1 request == 1 credit, always.
  • Low entry point of $19.
  • Integrations for NodeJS, Python, Java, Rust, Scrapy and PHP.
  • Optional Javascript rendering for scraping dynamic pages.
  • Web UI player for testing and experimenting.
  • Does not charges for blocked requests.
Cons
  • Extremely limited feature set — no request header and other basic request customizations.
  • Static 1 credit pricing leaves no room for pricing optimizations.
  • Programming integrations are relatively basic and outdated.
  • Significantly slower than competition.
  • Credits do not carry over month-to-month.

Benchmark Comparison

Success rate per target from the latest benchmark run. Higher is better; the winning value is highlighted in green.

Target Firecrawl success WebScrapingAPI success
all average 72.1% 67.5%
amazon.com 91.7% 90.7%
booking.com 91.8% 83.0%
etsy.com 99.7% 57.9%
indeed.com 66.6% -
instagram.com - 94.6%
linkedin.com - 81.5%
realtor.com 72.0% -
stockx.com 94.6% 92.0%
twitter.com 74.4% 67.6%
walmart.com 85.3% 81.0%
zillow.com 92.7% 97.6%
Data range Sep 11 - Sep 25

Feature Comparison

Feature Firecrawl WebScrapingAPI
Capterra ratingCapterra rating — —
Browser control Yes Yes, predefined actions like scroll, click, input
Custom JS evaluation Yes No
Geolocation 26 countries 12+ countries
Integrations Python, Javascript Python, Scrapy, NodeJS, Java, PHP, Rust
Javascreipt rendering Yes, enabled by default Yes, at extra cost
Proxy support Datacenter default, Residential (stealth) optional Datacenter default, Residential optional
Screenshots Yes, with a fullpage option and customizable viewport Yes, full page and individual elements
Sessions No Yes, persistent IP for 5min
Webhook support No No

Pricing Comparison

Firecrawl
Plan Price Credits Concurrency
Enterprise — ∞ ∞
Growth 333 500,000 100
Hobby 16 3,000 5
Standard 83 100,000 50
WebScrapingAPI
Plan Price Credits Concurrency
Started 19 7,000 20
Basic 49 20,000 20
Standard 99 45,000 50
Advanced 149 100,000 100
Premium 249 180,000 200
Pro 599 450,000 500

Determining the best web scraping API requires paying attention to various aspects. See our guide on what to look for in a web scraping API for the full details.