Firecrawl vs ScraperAPI

Firecrawl
www.firecrawl.dev
72%
Success
5.4s
Speed
$2.7
Cost
Visit site
Firecrawl
vs
ScraperAPI
ScraperAPI
www.scraperapi.com
52%
Success
7.5s
Speed
$4.05
Cost
Visit site

Side-by-side comparison of Firecrawl and ScraperAPI using the latest benchmark data for success rate, speed, cost, and features.

Pros & Cons of Firecrawl

Pros
  • Scrape websites data in LLM-ready format.
  • Ability to crawl entire websites using one API call.
  • Control the headless browser actions after a certain process.
  • Python and NodeJS SDKs.
  • Low pricing entry point at $19.
  • Integrations for no-code tools: n8n, Zapier, Make, and Dfyn.
Cons
  • Plan to credits are considered expensive compared to other services.
  • Blocked requests are charged.
  • Credits do not roll over to the next month/year.
  • No pay-per-use plan offered.
  • No support for webhook callbacks.

Pros & Cons of ScraperAPI

Pros
  • Effective scraper blocking bypass.
  • Integrations for Python, Javascript, Ruby, PHP, NodeJS
  • Automatic data parsing option.
  • Detailed web dashboard for reviewing scraping performance.
  • Web scheduler (called Datapipeline) that can scrape and deliver results on a defined schedule at extra cost.
  • Web UI player for testing and experimenting.
Cons
  • 10 minute result cache forced on difficult targets leading to stale data.
  • Steep entry point at $49.
  • Often charges for blocked requests.
  • Small geolocations pool, only US and EU locations on starting plans.
  • Limited javascript rendering feature set.
  • Credits do not carry over month-to-month.

Benchmark Comparison

Success rate per target from the latest benchmark run. Higher is better; the winning value is highlighted in green.

Target Firecrawl success ScraperAPI success
all average 72.1% 52.3%
amazon.com 91.7% 90.2%
booking.com 91.8% 1.1%
etsy.com 99.7% 96.2%
indeed.com 66.6% 28.1%
instagram.com - -
linkedin.com - 57.7%
realtor.com 72.0% 24.2%
stockx.com 94.6% 59.8%
twitter.com 74.4% -
walmart.com 85.3% 83.5%
zillow.com 92.7% 93.7%
Data range Sep 11 - Sep 25

Feature Comparison

Feature Firecrawl ScraperAPI
Capterra ratingCapterra rating —
★ 4.6
(62)
Browser control Yes No
Custom JS evaluation Yes No
Geolocation 26 countries 2 countries (13 for the highest tier)
Integrations Python, Javascript Python, Javascript, Ruby, PHP, NodeJS
Javascreipt rendering Yes, enabled by default Yes, at extra cost
Proxy support Datacenter default, Residential (stealth) optional Datacenter default, Residential optional, Mobile for custom plans
Screenshots Yes, with a fullpage option and customizable viewport No
Sessions No Yes, persistent IP for 15min
Webhook support No Yes

Pricing Comparison

Firecrawl
Plan Price Credits Concurrency
Enterprise — ∞ ∞
Growth 333 500,000 100
Hobby 16 3,000 5
Standard 83 100,000 50
ScraperAPI
Plan Price Credits Concurrency
Hobby 49 100,000 20
Startup 149 1,000,000 50
Business 299 3,000,000 100
Enterprise — — —

Determining the best web scraping API requires paying attention to various aspects. See our guide on what to look for in a web scraping API for the full details.