Firecrawl vs ZenRows
vs
Side-by-side comparison of Firecrawl and ZenRows using the latest benchmark data for success rate, speed, cost, and features.
Pros & Cons of Firecrawl
Pros
- Scrape websites data in LLM-ready format.
- Ability to crawl entire websites using one API call.
- Control the headless browser actions after a certain process.
- Python and NodeJS SDKs.
- Low pricing entry point at $19.
- Integrations for no-code tools: n8n, Zapier, Make, and Dfyn.
Cons
- Plan to credits are considered expensive compared to other services.
- Blocked requests are charged.
- Credits do not roll over to the next month/year.
- No pay-per-use plan offered.
- No support for webhook callbacks.
Pros & Cons of ZenRows
Pros
- Integrations for Python, Nodejs, Selenium, Puppeteer
- Captcha solver integration with 2Captcha.
- Optional Javascript rendering for scraping dynamic pages.
- Optional auto data parser.
- Web UI player for testing and experimenting.
Cons
- Very high entry point of 69$.
- Credits do not carry over month-to-month.
- Poor scraper blocking bypass without headless browser feature.
- Blocks use when many subsequent scrape blocks are encountered.
Benchmark Comparison
Success rate per target from the latest benchmark run. Higher is better; the winning value is highlighted in green.
Data range Sep 11 - Sep 25
Feature Comparison
Pricing Comparison
Firecrawl
| Plan | Price | Credits | Concurrency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | — | ∞ | ∞ |
| Growth | 333 | 500,000 | 100 |
| Hobby | 16 | 3,000 | 5 |
| Standard | 83 | 100,000 | 50 |
ZenRows
| Plan | Price | Credits | Concurrency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Developer | 69 | 250,000 | 10 |
| Startup | 99 | 1,000,000 | 25 |
| Business | 249 | 3,000,000 | 50 |
| Custom | — | — | — |
Determining the best web scraping API requires paying attention to various aspects. See our guide on what to look for in a web scraping API for the full details.