Firecrawl vs ScrapingBee
vs
Side-by-side comparison of Firecrawl and ScrapingBee using the latest benchmark data for success rate, speed, cost, and features.
Pros & Cons of Firecrawl
Pros
- Scrape websites data in LLM-ready format.
- Ability to crawl entire websites using one API call.
- Control the headless browser actions after a certain process.
- Python and NodeJS SDKs.
- Low pricing entry point at $19.
- Integrations for no-code tools: n8n, Zapier, Make, and Dfyn.
Cons
- Plan to credits are considered expensive compared to other services.
- Blocked requests are charged.
- Credits do not roll over to the next month/year.
- No pay-per-use plan offered.
- No support for webhook callbacks.
Pros & Cons of ScrapingBee
Pros
- Python and NodeJS SDKs.
- Detailed web dashboard for tracking scraping performance.
- Web UI player for testing and experimenting.
- Big feature set and extended headless browser support.
Cons
- Poor entry point of $49.
- Credits are often charged for blocked requests.
- Credits do not carry over month-to-month.
- Some targets are not supported or cost well above industry average (see benchmarks).
Benchmark Comparison
Success rate per target from the latest benchmark run. Higher is better; the winning value is highlighted in green.
Data range Sep 11 - Sep 25
Feature Comparison
Pricing Comparison
Firecrawl
| Plan | Price | Credits | Concurrency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | — | ∞ | ∞ |
| Growth | 333 | 500,000 | 100 |
| Hobby | 16 | 3,000 | 5 |
| Standard | 83 | 100,000 | 50 |
ScrapingBee
| Plan | Price | Credits | Concurrency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hobby | 19 | 75,000 | 25 |
| Freelance | 49 | 250,000 | 50 |
| Startup | 99 | 1,000,000 | 100 |
| Business | 249 | 3,000,000 | 200 |
Determining the best web scraping API requires paying attention to various aspects. See our guide on what to look for in a web scraping API for the full details.