ScraperAPI vs WebScrapingAPI

ScraperAPI
www.scraperapi.com
52%
Success
7.5s
Speed
$4.05
Cost
Visit site
ScraperAPI
vs
WebScrapingAPI
WebScrapingAPI
www.webscrapingapi.com
68%
Success
17.7s
Speed
$2.04
Cost
Visit site

Side-by-side comparison of ScraperAPI and WebScrapingAPI using the latest benchmark data for success rate, speed, cost, and features.

Pros & Cons of ScraperAPI

Pros
  • Effective scraper blocking bypass.
  • Integrations for Python, Javascript, Ruby, PHP, NodeJS
  • Automatic data parsing option.
  • Detailed web dashboard for reviewing scraping performance.
  • Web scheduler (called Datapipeline) that can scrape and deliver results on a defined schedule at extra cost.
  • Web UI player for testing and experimenting.
Cons
  • 10 minute result cache forced on difficult targets leading to stale data.
  • Steep entry point at $49.
  • Often charges for blocked requests.
  • Small geolocations pool, only US and EU locations on starting plans.
  • Limited javascript rendering feature set.
  • Credits do not carry over month-to-month.

Pros & Cons of WebScrapingAPI

Pros
  • Good scraper blocking bypass.
  • Simple pricing structure 1 request == 1 credit, always.
  • Low entry point of $19.
  • Integrations for NodeJS, Python, Java, Rust, Scrapy and PHP.
  • Optional Javascript rendering for scraping dynamic pages.
  • Web UI player for testing and experimenting.
  • Does not charges for blocked requests.
Cons
  • Extremely limited feature set — no request header and other basic request customizations.
  • Static 1 credit pricing leaves no room for pricing optimizations.
  • Programming integrations are relatively basic and outdated.
  • Significantly slower than competition.
  • Credits do not carry over month-to-month.

Benchmark Comparison

Success rate per target from the latest benchmark run. Higher is better; the winning value is highlighted in green.

Target ScraperAPI success WebScrapingAPI success
all average 52.3% 67.5%
amazon.com 90.2% 90.7%
booking.com 1.1% 83.0%
etsy.com 96.2% 57.9%
indeed.com 28.1% -
instagram.com - 94.6%
linkedin.com 57.7% 81.5%
realtor.com 24.2% -
stockx.com 59.8% 92.0%
twitter.com - 67.6%
walmart.com 83.5% 81.0%
zillow.com 93.7% 97.6%
Data range Sep 11 - Sep 25

Feature Comparison

Feature ScraperAPI WebScrapingAPI
Capterra ratingCapterra rating
★ 4.6
(62)
 		—
Integrations Python, Javascript, Ruby, PHP, NodeJS Python, Scrapy, NodeJS, Java, PHP, Rust
Proxy support Datacenter default, Residential optional, Mobile for custom plans Datacenter default, Residential optional
Geolocation 2 countries (13 for the highest tier) 12+ countries
Webhook support Yes No
Javascreipt rendering Yes, at extra cost Yes, at extra cost
Custom JS evaluation No No
Browser control No Yes, predefined actions like scroll, click, input
Screenshots No Yes, full page and individual elements
Sessions Yes, persistent IP for 15min Yes, persistent IP for 5min

Pricing Comparison

ScraperAPI
Plan Price Credits Concurrency
Hobby 49 100,000 20
Startup 149 1,000,000 50
Business 299 3,000,000 100
Enterprise — — —
WebScrapingAPI
Plan Price Credits Concurrency
Started 19 7,000 20
Basic 49 20,000 20
Standard 99 45,000 50
Advanced 149 100,000 100
Premium 249 180,000 200
Pro 599 450,000 500

Determining the best web scraping API requires paying attention to various aspects. See our guide on what to look for in a web scraping API for the full details.