Best Web Scraping APIs for Instagram: July 2026 Benchmark

Benchmarks run by the Scrapeway team ยท Last updated: August 14, 2026 ยท How we benchmark

Scrapfly is the best web scraping API for Instagram, with a 96% success rate across 8 web scraping APIs benchmarked against live Instagram pages in July 2026. 3 of the 8 cleared Instagram reliably enough to recommend.

Instagram is protected by Imperva and gates a lot of data behind a login wall, so most scraping APIs either fail it or pay for it in speed and cost. The benchmark is refreshed twice a month, with no affiliate links and no sponsors.

Ranked by live Instagram success rate, best first:

  1. ๐Ÿฅ‡ Scrapfly: 96% success on Instagram
  2. ๐Ÿฅˆ Scrapingant: 93% success on Instagram
  3. ๐Ÿฅ‰ WebScrapingAPI: 91% success on Instagram

All 4 web scraping APIs for Instagram, ranked

# Service Success Speed Cost/1k Capterra rating Code
1 ๐Ÿฅ‡
96%
6.5s $4.43 (237)
โ˜… 4.9
code
2 ๐Ÿฅˆ
93%
13.1s $1.9 n/a code
3 ๐Ÿฅ‰
91%
12.9s $2.71 n/a code
4
31%
3.2s $3.4 (137)
โ˜… 4.9
code
Data range Jul 31 to Aug 14

Ranking history: web scraping APIs for Instagram over time

Instagram target ranking history

The 4 web scraping APIs for Instagram, reviewed

1. Scrapfly: 96% success on Instagram

On InstagramSpeedCost/1kOverallFrom
96% 6.5s $4.43 #1 of 4 $30/mo

Instagram puts Imperva in front of its public profile and post pages, and the data is served through its internal GraphQL style JSON endpoints rather than the visible HTML. Scrapfly cleared 96% here by generating a genuine browser fingerprint and passing Imperva's checks, so it reaches the public profile and post data instead of a challenge or login wall. Because it only bills for successful requests, the block and login wall pages Instagram returns don't quietly run up the cost.

At $4.43 per 1,000 successful requests and 6.5s average response time, the figures are strong for an API clearing Imperva at this rate. The 96% success rate is the headline, and the ranking history above shows how that rate has held across previous runs.

Pros:

  • Highest success rate in the Instagram benchmark this run, clearing Imperva's fingerprinting on public pages
  • Only charges for successful scrapes, so challenge and login wall pages cost nothing
  • One asp flag plus residential proxies handles Instagram with little tuning
  • First class SDKs for Python, TypeScript, Go, and Rust, plus a Scrapy extension

Cons:

  • Credit cost per request rises once ASP, JavaScript rendering, or residential proxies are enabled
  • The entry (Discovery) plan caps concurrency at 5, so large profile crawls need a higher tier
  • The free tier is a single batch of 1,000 credits, enough to prototype but not to benchmark at volume

2. Scrapingant: 93% success on Instagram

On InstagramSpeedCost/1kOverallFrom
93% 13.1s $1.90 #2 of 4 $19/mo

Scrapingant bundles JavaScript rendering and session support at a low entry price, with a smaller feature surface than the larger providers. On Instagram it cleared 93% this run.

Pros:

  • Low sticker price
  • JavaScript rendering included

Cons:

  • Smaller feature surface and fewer integration options than the larger providers
  • Billing covers requests that return block or challenge pages, so failures still cost credits
  • Small provider with a thin public track record

3. WebScrapingAPI: 91% success on Instagram

On InstagramSpeedCost/1kOverallFrom
91% 12.9s $2.71 #3 of 4 $19/mo

WebScrapingAPI covers a broad range of language SDKs behind a simple REST interface, so it drops into most stacks without a client library, and it supports async and batch submission for queued jobs. The scorecard carries this run's speed and cost. On Instagram it cleared 91% this run.

Pros:

  • Broad language SDK range behind a simple REST interface
  • Async and batch submission for queued jobs

Cons:

  • Imperva's block and login wall pages make it easy to keep paying unless you check content
  • Support tickets often go unanswered for days, per user reviews

4. Scrapingbee: 31% success on Instagram

On InstagramSpeedCost/1kOverallFrom
31% 3.2s $3.40 #4 of 4 $49/mo

Scrapingbee is fast and cheap per request, with JavaScript rendering for lighter targets. Instagram is a hard case for it, because Imperva scores browser signals on every request and the login wall gates much of the data, and every blocked request still costs credits. On Instagram it cleared 31% this run.

Pros:

  • Fast response times
  • Low sticker cost per request

Cons:

  • Imperva's per request scoring penalizes an HTTP first approach
  • Credits burn quickly once JavaScript rendering or premium proxies are enabled
  • No plan tier between the small and large options

About scraping Instagram

Instagram is one of the largest social platforms, and the data people scrape from it is mostly public profile detail. That means usernames and display names, bios, follower and following counts, post counts, captions, like and comment counts, hashtags, and media URLs from public profiles and posts. Most of this is reachable on public profile pages and individual post pages without an account.

Instagram is a JavaScript heavy app that serves its data through internal GraphQL style JSON endpoints rather than the page HTML, so the reliable approach reads those JSON responses instead of parsing the DOM. A large amount of data, including private accounts, follower lists, and full feeds, sits behind a login wall and is out of scope for public scraping. The benchmark targets public profile and post data only.

Instagram is protected by Imperva. See the Imperva benchmark page for how Imperva detects bots. The practical detail for scraping Instagram is that blocks often come back as a login wall redirect or an empty response rather than a hard error, so success has to be measured on response content, not status codes.

instagram_scraper.py
import json
from parsel import Selector

# install using `pip install scrapfly-sdk`
from scrapfly import ScrapflyClient, ScrapeConfig, ScrapeApiResponse

# create an API client instance
client = ScrapflyClient(key="YOUR API KEY")

# create scrape function that returns HTML parser for a given URL
def scrape(url: str, country: str="", render_js=False, headers: dict=None) -> Selector:
    api_result = client.scrape(ScrapeConfig(
            url=url,
            headers=headers,
            asp=True,
            render_js=render_js or True,
            cache=False,
            cache_ttl=900,
            method='GET',
    ))
    return api_result.selector

# this example show how instagram can be scraped through their backend API
username = "google"
selector = scrape(
    url=f"https://i.instagram.com/api/v1/users/web_profile_info/?username={username}",
    headers={"x-ig-app-id": "936619743392459"},  # this is needed to access IG backend API
)

# this returns a giant JSON dataset with all Instagram profile details
dataset = selector.get()['data']['user']

# some examples of what can be found in the dataset:
from pprint import pprint
pprint(dataset)
Output $ python instagram_scraper.py
  {
  "biography": "Google unfiltered\u2014sometimes with filters.",
  "external_url": "https://linkin.bio/google",
  "external_url_linkshimmed": "https://l.instagram.com/?u=https%3A%2F%2Flinkin.bio%2Fgoogle&e=AT1fNmnZFR3WyD72UwTTj1nHk-vS6oGaZH57Gwqfq6nj35T_1H3nVcQIphay4l-3qTHSrrBm0QqrKi7TWRjhQEVXLB0VTNYeLNuD_zP-FVr9BOxP",
  "edge_followed_by": {
  "count": 14995780
  },
  "fbid": "17841401778116675",
  "edge_follow": {
  "count": 34
  },
  "full_name": "Google",
  "business_address_json": "{\"city_name\": \"Mountain View, California\", \"city_id\": 108212625870265, \"latitude\": 37.4221, \"longitude\": -122.08432, \"street_address\": \"1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy\", \"zip_code\": \"94043\"}",
  "category_enum": "INTERNET_COMPANY",
  "category_name": "Internetunternehmen",
  "is_verified": true,
  "is_verified_by_mv4b": false,
  "profile_pic_url": "https://instagram.fdtm2-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t51.2885-19/425391724_2454717941393726_7200817596193793590_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_s150x150&_nc_ht=instagram.fdtm2-2.fna.fbcdn.net&_nc_cat=1&_nc_ohc=p9yxdQR7qOMAb6AQvYj&edm=AOQ1c0wBAAAA&ccb=7-5&oh=00_AfBkva0psR8QgUzFcA0TqYyQNcqt5qBLrxASA62nS2umiw&oe=661EA69C&_nc_sid=8b3546",
  "username": "google",
  ... recent posts and much more
  }

How to choose a web scraping API for Instagram

Because Instagram sits behind Imperva and a login wall, start by narrowing to the providers still clearing it this run (the top of the ranked table), then choose within that set based on your job. Low volume public profile lookups give you more room on cost. Large profile or post crawls put more weight on reliability and concurrency.

  • Reliability first. Scrapfly leads the current Instagram ranking, which makes it the default starting point for production public profile crawls. The ranking history shows its track record.
  • Value. Among the APIs still clearing Instagram, sort by cost per successful request. The cheapest sticker price is rarely the cheapest per usable Instagram page.
  • Speed. For latency sensitive profile lookups rather than bulk crawls, pick the fastest option that still clears Instagram reliably.

The key principle is to judge on cost per successful request, not sticker price. Imperva returns block pages and login wall redirects that can look like a normal response, so a cheap API can burn through requests without returning usable data, which makes its real cost per usable result far higher than the rate card suggests.

How we benchmark web scraping APIs for Instagram

We independently benchmark 8 web scraping APIs against live Instagram pages, 1,000+ requests per service, twice a month. Every API is tested against the same public Instagram URLs at the same time, and cost is measured per 1,000 successful requests on entry plan pricing. We pay for the plans ourselves. No affiliate links. No sponsors. Just data.

8 APIs ยท 1,000+ requests each ยท twice a month ยท no affiliate links, no sponsors

Benchmarking Instagram has one wrinkle worth knowing about. Success is measured on response content, not HTTP status codes. Imperva's block responses and Instagram's login wall redirects can return without a hard error status, so a test that only checked the status code would overstate results. We verify that responses contain the expected public profile or post data before counting them as successful. Every provider is tested against the same URLs in the same run, so the numbers stay comparable. Latest data: Jul 31 to Aug 14, 2026.

Frequently asked questions about scraping Instagram

Is it legal to scrape Instagram?

Scraping publicly available Instagram data is more sensitive than scraping ecommerce listings because profiles and posts often contain personal data, which can fall under privacy laws such as GDPR and CCPA. Instagram's Terms of Service also prohibit automated access. Legality depends on what you collect, where you operate, and how you use the data, so treat this as general information rather than legal advice and check your own situation.

What's the cheapest API that works on Instagram?

Sort the ranked table by cost per successful request and read down to the first provider still clearing Instagram this run. That's the cheapest option that actually delivers. Lower priced APIs further down often fail too many requests for their sticker price to be meaningful, and Instagram's blocks and login wall redirects hide those failures unless you check response content.

Do I need a headless browser to scrape Instagram?

In practice yes. Imperva scores browser signals on every request, and producing credible ones reliably needs a genuine browser context. The profile and post data itself comes from internal JSON endpoints rather than the page HTML, so once you're past Imperva you read those responses rather than the DOM. The APIs at the top of the ranking handle the browser and antibot layer for you.

Why do some APIs score low on Instagram?

Because Imperva blocks clients whose browser signals it doesn't trust, and Instagram redirects unauthenticated or suspicious requests to a login wall. Those responses come back as block or login wall pages, and since we score on response content, they count as failures rather than successes.

How often is this benchmark updated?

Twice a month against the same live public Instagram targets, 1,000+ requests per API each run. We publish after validating the run and checking failures for configuration or detection errors.

Conclusion

Instagram sits behind Imperva and a login wall, and serves its data through internal JSON endpoints, so the right web scraping API is one that clears the antibot layer reliably and reaches the public profile and post data. For production public profile crawls, start with Scrapfly, the highest success rate in the current run. For cost or speed on lighter lookups, choose among the providers still clearing Instagram this run.

Whatever you pick, verify results on response content rather than status codes, because Instagram's block pages and login wall redirects don't always carry a hard error status. The benchmark refreshes twice a month, so check the live Instagram results before committing.

Protected by: Imperva  ยท  Other social targets: LinkedIn ยท Twitter/X  ยท  Hub: All target benchmarks

Join the Scrapeway newsletter!

Early benchmark reports and industry insights every week!