Scrapingdog vs Firecrawl

Here's an in-depth comparison of Scrapingdog and Firecrawl web scraping services in web scraping speed, cost, success rate and feature set using the latest web scraping benchmark data for Nov 22 - Nov 28.

We'll start taking a look at the pros and cons summary of both Scrapingdog and Firecrawl web scraping services. Then we'll move on to the benchmark comparison table for the most popular web scraping targets covered by Scrapeway benchmarks. Finally, we'll compare the feature set and pricing of both services.

Pros

Scrapingdog

Firecrawl

Cons

Scrapingdog

Firecrawl

Benchmark Comparison

Next, it's the comparison table for the latest benchmarks of Scrapingdog and Firecrawl web scraping services for the most popular web scraping targets covered by Scrapeway benchmarks.

Scrapingdog
Firecrawl

Feature Comparison

Scrapingdog and Firecrawl feature comparison table and overview.

Feature Scrapingdog Firecrawl
Integrations
No
Python, Javascript
Proxy support
Datacenter, Residential extra cost
Datacenter default, Residential (stealth) optional
Geolocation
15 countries
26 countries
Webhook support
Yes
No
Javascreipt rendering
Yes, at extra cost
Yes, enabled by default
Custom JS evaluation
No
Yes
Browser control
No
Yes
Screenshots
Yes, full page only
Yes, with a fullpage option and customizable viewport
Sessions
Yes, persistent IP
No

Pricing Comparison

Scrapingdog and Firecrawl pricing comparison table and overview.

Scrapingdog

Firecrawl

Determining the best web scraping API requires paying attention to various aspects, including antibot bypass, infrastructure, and cost. See our guide on what to look for in a web scraping API for the full details. For more guides on choosing web scraping APIs, refer to our blog.