Scrapingant vs String

Scrapingant
scrapingant.com
31%
Success
16.9s
Speed
$1.42
Cost
Visit site
Scrapingant
vs
String
String
usestring.ai
65%
Success
11.1s
Speed
$0.3
Cost
Visit site

Side-by-side comparison of Scrapingant and String using the latest benchmark data for success rate, speed, cost, and features.

Pros & Cons
Scrapingant
Pros
Loading...
Cons
Loading...
String
Pros
Loading...
Cons
Loading...
Benchmark Comparison

Success rate per target from the latest benchmark run. Higher is better; the winning value is highlighted in green.

Target Scrapingant success String success
all average 31.0% 64.8%
amazon.com 13.2% 98.0%
booking.com 1.6% 98.7%
etsy.com 27.4% 90.0%
indeed.com - 34.4%
instagram.com 93.1% -
linkedin.com - -
realtor.com 1.5% 81.3%
stockx.com - 100.0%
twitter.com 81.7% -
walmart.com 84.9% 84.7%
zillow.com 11.8% 100.0%
Data range Aug 14 - Aug 28
Feature Comparison
Feature Scrapingant String
Capterra ratingCapterra rating — —
Integrations Python, Javascript No
Proxy support Datacenter default, Residential optional Datacenter, Residential extra cost
Geolocation 15 countries 40 countries
Webhook support Yes No
Javascreipt rendering Yes, at extra cost Yes, at extra cost
Custom JS evaluation Yes, up to 60s No
Browser control No Yes
Screenshots Yes, full or visible page only Yes, full page only
Sessions Yes, persistent IP No
Pricing Comparison
Scrapingant
Loading pricing...
String
Loading pricing...

Determining the best web scraping API requires paying attention to various aspects. See our guide on what to look for in a web scraping API for the full details.